Thursday, January 7, 2016

ESSENTIALS AND NON-ESSENTIALS

"In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, love" ~Rupertus Meldenius, (circa 1627).
A pseudo-truism. Another axiom of ecumenism, frequently tossed out in an effort (no doubt) to "justify" everyone and achieve "balance". A false balance is abomination to the LORD  Prov. 11:1.

This slogan  is familiar to many, although there is some debate about authorship. Augustine was a great "promoter" of it. Such slogans can be misleading and should be avoided. ESPECIALLY when used to divide Christians, for such is what it does. This statement has misled many in the past and is still doing it today. The only part Rupertus got right is "In all things, love."

But the Scriptures do not speak of some Bible truths as being essentials and others as non-essentials.

We love slogans.
A "Berean" would reject this slogan outright. Do you know why? Well first, a "Berean" would research it as to origin and context. And one would find that it is post-Constantine. Because of the lack of persecution (due to Constantine's "legitimization" of Christianity) there was a great influx of people into the church (mostly unrepentant pagans) who had little interest beyond getting "a ticket" to heaven. Many had little or no interest in living a life in conformity to Biblical teachings, as evidenced by recorded history.

This created conflict in the church (as is still evident today) between those who would compromise the Truth (lukewarm and antinomistic "Christians") and those who would protect it. Augustine attempted to bring peace by declaring that "anything close to perfection in Christian living was impossible", and caved into the world views. To make such a view acceptable, he emphasized, "In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, love".

There is quite a lot wrong with this slogan.

First, it fosters an approach that boils down Bible truths to the bare minimum "essentials."
It eliminates the need for Christ to be both Savior and Lord.

Secondly, it makes distinctions in Bible teachings that result in a pick-and-choose attitude. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works, 2 Tim. 3:16, 17.

ALL Scripture! Which of the scriptures, profitable for doctrine, can we assume to be non-essential with regard to Church agreement? Which of the scriptures... which instruction in righteousness, can we dismiss as unimportant to Church unity? No doubt those that are PROFITABLE for reproof and CORRECTION we can more easily (and readily) disagree on. THE ARROGANCE IS (almost) ENRAGING!

It is "a fine and easy way of rejecting the commandments of God, in order to keep the traditions of men. . . Thus making void the word of God" (Mk. 7:9, 13). Many do this in misunderstanding the doctrine of the Law and Grace. If you love me, you will keep my commandments. . . . He who has my commandments, and keeps them, he it is who loves me; and he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him, John 14:15, 21.

… and scripture cannot be broken, John 10:35.

Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven, Matt. 5:17-19.

We need to be careful about slogans. Everything, EVERYTHING (in a Christian's life) must express and conform to scriptural truths. Or we can cause great harm to individuals and the Church. A better slogan would be "In Biblical issues, unity. In non-Biblical issues, liberty. In all things, love."


But then one might ask, "What are non-Biblical issues?". Which part of your life does the Word of God, or The Lord Himself, not address and command? Let's consider something so (seemingly) innocuous as "Recreation". We might "agree to disagree" that bowling is more "morally acceptable" than boxing. While the Bible does not say (as far as I know) anything (specific) about bowling or boxing, it DOES nevertheless address "Recreation". And if we fail to correctly discern the lesson and guidance of such, we WILL fall into error. And "specious slogans" will keep us down.
___________________
Some material adapted from Leland M. Haines, © copyright 1997 by Leland M. Haines, Goshen, IN. USA



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.